Reporting on migration: magnifying glass or distorting lens?

  • 27 gennaio 2017

The media showing the refugee situation in Röszke collection point. Credits: UNHCR/Mark Henley

On January 25th, the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) brought together a large group of experts and well-known panellists in Brussels to debate the ways to balance the narrative on migration on both sides of the Mediterranean. During the event, which relates to the scope of the EUROMED Migration IV project, Aidan White, director of the Ethical Journalism Network (EJN), presented the first report on the study he is currently conducting on behalf of ICMPD about media and migration in the Mediterranean area.

The EUROMED Migration IV project aims to support all EU Member States and all European Neighborhood Instrument (ENI) Southern Partner Countries (SPC) in establishing a comprehensive operational dialogue and cooperation framework, with a focus on strengthening tools and capacities to shape coherent migration and international protection policies. Within this broad set of goals, understanding media dynamics when reporting on migration on both sides of the sea and promoting more truthful and unbiased information on the topic, together represent an ambitious but very much necessary objective for the project.

The findings of this first report portray the map of a region whose public opinion is strongly influenced by the media when it comes to topics such as migration and asylum. However, these media sources often put forward harmful and untruthful information, which is detrimental for both the migrant population and the hosting communities, since it generates and reinforces a climate of fear and insecurity. The study pays due attention to the lack of resources in media newsrooms, which urges them to rely often upon ill-equipped and badly-paid free-lancers, or which does not allow investment in training and information sessions on specific issues, such as the legal and historical basis of migration.

Social media also negatively influences the work of journalists and media broadcasts, as it encourages a “rush to publish” that privileges the quantity over the quality and trustworthiness of the news.

The report also remarks that most of the media in North African countries lags behind the rest of the world in acknowledging their new status as host countries as opposed to their previous one as transit countries. As a consequence, migration media coverage is distorted and out-of-date.

Drawing on the conclusions of this first phase of the project, the EJN has drafted a list of recommendations, among which are the following:

  • Expand and export national virtuous initiatives, such as the Charter of Rome (Italy) and the Greek Charter of Idomeni (Greece) and exchange best media practices;
  • Develop online and offline training programs for journalists addressing sensitive issues such as international humanitarian law, the use of correct terminology, ethical use of images and videos, inclusion of migrants’ voices in media coverage;
  • Improve the working conditions of journalists, free-lancers and reporters;
  • Prepare handbooks on migration with a special focus on the glossary and distinction of legal statuses;
  • Expand national and international funding schemes for media broadcasters without compromising their independence.
Leave a Reply